My Git Branching Model

2015-09-11 - I like (and also use) this simple yet powerful Git branching model by Juan Benet.

We all probably know a successful Git branching model which is a very interesting model for teams who want to use Git. However, this model is a bit too complex for common needs. So here is my lightweight model.

I use two main branches:

  • master : the code in a production-ready state;
  • develop : the integration branch.

I also use feature branches. A feature branch contains a work in progress. Keep in mind that a feature branch should reflect a feature in your backlog. I use a convention for these branches, I always prefix them with feat-.

> git branch
* master

A feature branch has two constraints:

  • the code must come from the develop branch;
  • the code must be merged in the develop branch.

To create a feature branch, I use the following command:

> git checkout -b feat-my-feature develop

To merge a feature branch into develop, I use the following set of commands:

# Go back to the develop branch
> git checkout develop

# Get last commits
> git pull --ff-only origin develop

# Switch to the feature branch
> git checkout feat-my-feature

# Time to rebase
> git rebase develop

# Then, switch to the develop branch in order to merge the feature branch
> git checkout develop

> git merge --no-ff feat-my-feature

# Push
> git push origin develop

# Finally, delete your branch
> git branch -d feat-my-feature

I always merge a feature branch into develop using --no-ff to keep a clean log:

The --no--ff option allows to keep track of a feature branch name which is quite useful. The following git log output shows you a feature branch merged with this option:

commit 481771556824c4ae2e6da73ef14d6ce757fb5870
Merge: 6abdd70 8cfe5a7
Author: William DURAND <>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 11:31:56 2012 +0100

Merge branch 'feat-my-feature' into develop

commit 8cfe5a7da159663cc09a850bee49a59ce046c67e
Author: William DURAND <>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 11:31:19 2012 +0100

Added a new feature

commit 6abdd707aace50ee5aad72a3c6fcff2f36cdea7f
Author: William DURAND <>
Date:   Sun May 15 14:07:19 2011 +0200

Initial commit

Without the --no-ff option, you'll get the following output:

commit 0d5805d52e55e4941ce23585a4cd559e5e643207
Author: William DURAND <>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 11:35:43 2012 +0100

Added yet another feature

commit 6abdd707aace50ee5aad72a3c6fcff2f36cdea7f
Author: William DURAND <>
Date:   Sun May 15 14:07:19 2011 +0200

Initial commit

In a team, you will probably have more than one feature branch, and you could have a dependency between two branches (this should be avoided). In this case, I use another branch in which I merge two or more feature branches.

> git checkout -b feat-my-feature-with-another-feature develop

Then, I can merge the two feature branches, and solve possible conflicts:

> git merge feat-my-feature

> git merge feat-another-feature

I don't use any other branches. The last part of the model is to merge develop into master. To avoid conflicts, there should be only one person who owns this responsability: the release manager.

I experimented this model with different teams in terms of number of people and skills, and I never had more needs. I know some people use releases but it can be handled in another way.

All credits go to Vincent Driessen and his Git model.

By the way, if you found a typo, please fork and edit this post. Thank you so much! This post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

If you like this post or if you use one of the Open Source projects I maintain, say hello by email. There is also my Amazon Wish List. Thank you ♥


Fork me on GitHub